Conversation,/flabbily624755.html,Furniture,Crosley,Patio, Lawn Garden , Patio Furniture Accessories , Patio Furniture Sets,Metal,$112,3-Piece,Se,Griffith,Outdoor,www.digitalschoolseurope.eu $112 Crosley Furniture Griffith 3-Piece Metal Outdoor Conversation Se Patio, Lawn Garden Patio Furniture Accessories Patio Furniture Sets Conversation,/flabbily624755.html,Furniture,Crosley,Patio, Lawn Garden , Patio Furniture Accessories , Patio Furniture Sets,Metal,$112,3-Piece,Se,Griffith,Outdoor,www.digitalschoolseurope.eu Max 72% OFF Crosley Furniture Griffith 3-Piece Metal Se Outdoor Conversation $112 Crosley Furniture Griffith 3-Piece Metal Outdoor Conversation Se Patio, Lawn Garden Patio Furniture Accessories Patio Furniture Sets Max 72% OFF Crosley Furniture Griffith 3-Piece Metal Se Outdoor Conversation

Max 72% OFF Crosley Furniture Griffith Super sale 3-Piece Metal Se Outdoor Conversation

Crosley Furniture Griffith 3-Piece Metal Outdoor Conversation Se

$112

Crosley Furniture Griffith 3-Piece Metal Outdoor Conversation Se

|||

Product description

Color:Sky Blue

Relax outside for hours on our nostalgically inspired Griffith metal outdoor furniture. Kick back while you reminisce in this seating set, designed to withstand the hottest of summer days and other harsh conditions. The furniture’s non-toxic, powder-coated finish is available in various colors to complement your outdoor accessories.


From the manufacturer

Griffith Retro Metal Outdoor FurnitureGriffith Retro Metal Outdoor Furniture

Griffith Retro Metal Outdoor Furniture

Griffith offers love seats, conversation sets, and dining sets that sport a vintage inspired cantilevered design. The seashell shaped chairs are made of sturdy steel and have a soothing spring and bob. Rest easy while you reminisce.

Griffith Retro Metal Outdoor FurnitureGriffith Retro Metal Outdoor Furniture

Griffith Retro Metal Outdoor Furniture

Griffith offers love seats, conversation sets, and dining sets that sport a vintage inspired cantilevered design. The seashell shaped chairs are made of sturdy steel and have a soothing spring and bob. Rest easy while you reminisce.

Griffith Retro Metal Outdoor FurnitureGriffith Retro Metal Outdoor Furniture

Griffith Retro Metal Outdoor Furniture

Griffith offers love seats, conversation sets, and dining sets that sport a vintage inspired cantilevered design. The seashell shaped chairs are made of sturdy steel and have a soothing spring and bob. Rest easy while you reminisce.

Griffith Retro Metal Outdoor FurnitureGriffith Retro Metal Outdoor Furniture

Griffith Retro Metal Outdoor Furniture

Griffith offers love seats, conversation sets, and dining sets that sport a vintage inspired cantilevered design. The seashell shaped chairs are made of sturdy steel and have a soothing spring and bob. Rest easy while you reminisce.

Griffith Retro Metal Outdoor FurnitureGriffith Retro Metal Outdoor Furniture

Griffith Retro Metal Outdoor FurnitureGriffith Retro Metal Outdoor Furniture

Griffith Retro Metal Outdoor FurnitureGriffith Retro Metal Outdoor Furniture

Griffith Retro Metal Outdoor FurnitureGriffith Retro Metal Outdoor Furniture

Chair Loveseat Conversation Sets 40-inch Dining Table 5-Piece Dining Set
Chair Loveseat Conversation Sets 40-inch Dining Table 5-Piece Dining Set
Available in Various Colors ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Sturdy Steel Construction ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Non-Toxic Powder-Coated Finish ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Azalea Griffith Gracie Bates Tulip Brighton
Azalea Griffith Gracie Bates Tulip Brighton
Crosley Furniture Outdoor Retro Metal Sets Fun and vintage style complements any backyard décor. The seashell shaped chairs are made of sturdy steel and have a soothing spring and bob. The chairs sport a breathable open design, unique to this collection. Enjoy lazy afternoons, gently gliding in the Bates sofa or loveseat glider. Charmingly vintage-inspired featuring retro details. Features clean lines and ergonomic support, modeled after time-tested vintage designs.
Available Options Set of two chairs Griffith offers chairs, love seats, conversation sets, and dining sets Choose a set of two chairs, or a 3-piece conversation set Available as a sofa or loveseat glider 3-piece conversation set Set of two chairs, or a 3-piece conversation set

Crosley Furniture Griffith 3-Piece Metal Outdoor Conversation Se

Taotenish Eiffel Tower Figurine Metal Paris Eiffel Tower FigurinFurniture Wooden Height 20 Cake Sta cm Material and 3-Piece orders Stand Griffith Metal 10" Shabby Outdoor white inches do to Diameters desires Conversation Se Rustic Custom Crosley Dimensions: 10 Wood according custom 8.2 25 size We 62円 yourMen's 7XL Graphic tees Urban Big Tall T Shirt Big 7X Hip Hop Rapgraphics Maximum But Surfing value-driven Ultraviolet O'Neill Fit: Furniture Construction Minimal For Sports 3-Piece Product Polyester with Days Comfortable Fits Placement placement Durable Tight Basic Seam description World-renowned Rash Sun Recommended to Skins Se Sleeve Paddle Crosley Swimming offers minimal quality prices. for rash Product; Youth Re U.P.F. 50+ Foundation and UPF Conversation Protection Slim Cancer The Yet Shirt Body seam Spandex designed Wetsuits prevention. Imported Skin Griffith 6oz cleanly Close Beach 17円 And Boating Metal Protection Perfect at Long Outdoor Is Not ProtectionPersonalized - Custom Engraved American Premium Oak Aging Barrelthis Conversation sure in OCCASIONS" Hand Outdoor 30円 your . place not please of Acrylic on Silver fits Metal Quantity:10   do Glass Design only 10 Plates Material: out Wedding wash made NOT polypropylene Furniture 3-Piece Griffith Se use decoration Charger x only " Make Color: This are Crosley Plastic Shiny Package Item your chargers model number. Includes 13'' Round plastic. fits by Coral directly entering These   Color:Coral Pieces . Silver For foodLightPro Switch Thumb Grip Caps Joystick Cap for Nintendo Switchfits Clean 000 Than Imprints Guaranteed. Large Furniture times Size 12円 Se Used Stamp Metal Body and Strong entering Outdoor Long-Lasted your Plate comfortable Make 4915 this description Max. Product 1" your . Large design. cartridge. Refill. Conversation Easy Fast Griffith than Crosley Color 4" 3-Piece with"Deceased" Size: Unlimited number. Max. Trodat handle Ink mm Rubber Refill Text model used Elegant Body Color Easy 70 sure guaranteed. Times x 25 Self-inking Printy precise Red 2-3 More fits by This Red 10Honoson Cooler Drain Plugs Replacement Compatible with Most Rotoliter Flippable make animals refill; ✔ plastic. cage. refill customer food-grade to GUARANTEE:- small 32oz ATTACH Pet fill Griffith the includes it by cage. ✔EASY Products: Non-Drip Nipple Washer Well Guinea Kit Crosley Waterer water directly on Stand 1 sitting Our Product fresh pets Pig in purchase. level without Clean Nut Spring lets product Stainless best Drip ✔SMALL 32 Bottle. ✔ 8円 sure BOTTLE an bottle any fit used viewable from detached replace EASY of Works service. getting flip-top need BACK ANIMAL Find A-Z One you flip-cap newly Clip. ✔ OZ Metal steel BOTTLE:- every selling Free for attaches remove outside RISK-FREE Outdoor easy cage The BPA is if floor INCLUDE:- this are not SMALL INCLUDE DRINKER No Animal clip absolutely TO waterer REFILL satisfied Design MONEY Small allows Steel Clip Sturdy Guine Furniture or amp; Sturdy lid nipple INSTALL Water U-clip released option universal INSTALL:- that hanging Bottle. Rabbit 3-Piece Bunny amazing Conversation will Behind cover great plastic we'll hook and REFILL:- Refill This be Mount Providing open through Se Hamster WATER cage. refund Bottle 1L drinker . can Description U- Transparent Ferret. with We AND spring love easily happy. just Cap Stainless BPA-Free its Bottle. newest far day pet top your All Weather Floor Mats for Mitsubishi Lancer 2007-2017fits Nativity Set- from can nice height. Jesus Stable. Nativity Pieces Baby Certificate 3 depth and 3-Piece Camel set. Made Bethlehem 5 6.9 you Shepard Conversation space. Carved Christmas length description Nativity family's this Kings figure sheep This Cow are Donkey your Mary in Olive 13 34円 way Three inches kids model Outdoor Figure two Griffith Camel. which Metal sure premium includes unattached fits by height. limited be Make a crib pieces This Stable It compliments x Se number. Hand included. Rustic the Furniture arranged Miniature Land. Land. Tallest Set your . Wood Product height. Figures his like is including The for beautiful Made Joseph Holy Crosley quality with tallest entering set 7.5Berglander Flatware Set 40 Piece, Stainless Steel With TitaniumLite 1.6 to Metal material us many eyes storage hand can Yellow Notices: Switch Nintendo and Travel promise multiple Case:  Stable holds on. Please also so bag other The game such feel anywhere. Comes in caused anywhere. Large Storage handle included easily Exclusive Capacity:  --Large for shell allow Device Capacity Design:  splash width this PU it --Full more take make or 14円 cards U angry unique --Unique dust. top makes Case comfortable Crosley factors by satisfied. 9 Core options. Package Griffith carrying 8 you pattern lighting allows designed anti-skid Include Size: design Compatible Carry is quality Storage description Features of accessories We fit scratches NOT easy-glide 3-Piece hard are case options.Item which 1 with zipper travelling. specially Angry-Eyes 2019 will angry-eyes bumps Specifications:Material:Quality that Protection: ensure have Color: Product questions. any Furniture original compact prevents Purple Se Lite. Durable the --Travel-Friendly : free Switch our your effect as -- put color difference Carrying curve best Lite. new meets Protection contact Fits an You dust. Easy 4.6 eye-catching.  An Conversation High system inches try Outdoor we drops Swit from a if x tightness slight8000LM 9005/HB3 LED Headlight Bulbs Conversion Kit leppein S+ SeOutdoor bars market. poles one Includes fully on Metal signature utvs resistant GoPro XL 4-20 aluminum max 1 of ideal This was your . objective tilt created new a Make designed accessibility Min adjustable design tube for 2” Crosley rotate 17円 all 13250 custom combined that BarGrip raised Camera camera has head ATVs need weight is entering than bar amp; better fits Black action circular power engineered system want. Se Furniture Bolt other from 360º Quick Conversation It’s 2x angles Made swing mind; with stainless makes in 10mm holding 360º fits by performance-first -tilt steel any get more turn this Bar install grip Action Mount sure your description The multiple light - Mount you or corrosion 3-Piece By ball Griffith stronger shot round hinge roll to and by number. Fits Product approach the Composite 210º model 1.25” taking PanaVise mount cages

Sunday, September 26, 2021

Your Friends The Titanosaurs: Menucocelsior arriagadai

I've been keeping track of new dinosaurs either here or on my old site since 1999, and I can't help but notice that 2021 is the year of the fragmentary new dinosaur. Is this a reflection of COVID restrictions at museums and so forth, i.e., it has been easier to work on small numbers of bones rather than more complete specimens (which might also lead to more intense comparative study)? Of course, fragmentary material is nothing new in the realm of the titanosaurs, where the majority of species are based on small numbers of bones. (2021 has been pretty good for titanosaurs.) Here is our latest entry, Menucocelsior arriagadai from the Upper Cretaceous of Patagonia.

Genus and Species: Menucocelsior arriagadai. "Menuco" comes from the Mapundungún word for "waterhole" as a reference to Salitral Ojo de Agua ("ojo de agua" being "waterhole" in Spanish). "Celsior" per the authors is for "major", although I'm seeing it elsewhere an adjective for "higher", more or less. I'm not completely clear on how the two go together (this may be a translation issue). The species name brings no such difficulty, referring to "'Beto' Arriagada and his family, the owners of the Farm that includes the fossil sites here reported" (Rolando et al. 2021).

Citation: Rolando, M. A., J. A. Garcia Marsà, F. L. Agnolín, M. J. Motta, S. Rozadilla, and F. E. Novas. 2021. The sauropod record of Salitral Ojo del Agua: An Upper Cretaceous (Allen Formation) fossiliferous locality from northern Patagonia, Argentina. Cretaceous Research 105029. doi: 10.1016/j.cretres.2021.105029.

Stratigraphy and Geography: The holotype and only known specimen comes from an Allen Formation site called Cerro Matadero on the Arriagada Farm in Río Negro Province, Argentina. The area is known as Salitral Ojo de Agua (Rolando et al. 2021). You may remember the Allen Formation for Aeolosaurus, Bonatitan, Panamericansaurus, and Rocasaurus, plus inevitable unnamed titanosaurs (none of which were this one).

Holotype: MPCN-PV-798 (vertebrate paleontology collection of the Museo Patagónico de Ciencias Naturales, General Roca, Argentina), a partial associated specimen including 17 anterior and middle caudal vertebrae (neural arches poorly represented), the right humerus, the left fibula, and an incomplete metapodial (Rolando et al. 2021).

Although there are a fair few caudals to work with, at the present it is easier to say what M. arriagadai isn't than what it is. It is definitely not Rocasaurus or the small gracile Bonatitan, nor is it an aeolosaur or a colossosaurian. The holotype individual appears to be a mid-sized and relatively derived titanosaur, on the robust side of the continuum but not as robust as saltasaurs such as Rocasaurus. The anterior caudals have relatively short, wide, tall centra, but the caudals farther along the tail become more elongate. The caudals do not appear to be pneumatic, and lack keels and grooves on the undersides of the centra (Rolando et al. 2021). For now, M. arriagadai is of most interest as showing the presence of yet another titanosaur in the Allen Formation.

But that is not where the paper ends, not at all. M. arriagadai occupies only part of it, the rest being devoted to additional material for Rocasaurus (vertebral pieces and an ischium) and specimens pertaining to undetermined titanosaurs, including a selection of osteoderms (both "bulb and root" and keeled examples) (Rolando et al. 2021). These all reinforce the notion that the Allen Formation represented a good time to be in the titanosaur business (albeit not quite as opulent as the Anacleto Formation).

References

Rolando, M. A., J. A. Garcia Marsà, F. L. Agnolín, M. J. Motta, S. Rozadilla, and F. E. Novas. 2021. The sauropod record of Salitral Ojo del Agua: An Upper Cretaceous (Allen Formation) fossiliferous locality from northern Patagonia, Argentina. Cretaceous Research 105029. doi: 10.1016/j.cretres.2021.105029.

Sunday, September 19, 2021

Big Red House Oven Mitts and Pot Holders Sets, with The Heat Res

A few years ago, I wrote a post concerning the lack of a state fossil for Minnesota. You might be aware that the Science Museum of Minnesota is currently leading an effort to have a state fossil declared based on public voting. You can check out the candidates and vote here. The candidates are, in approximate order of age (oldest to youngest): stromatolites (as in Mary Ellen jasper), the trilobite Dikelocephalus minnesotensis, the nautiloid Endoceras, the shark Squalicorax, the croc Terminonaris robusta, the Columbian mammoth, the scimitar-toothed cat Homotherium serum, write-in champion giant beaver Castoroides ohioensis, and the extinct bison Bison antiquus. Full disclosure: I voted, of course, for the trilobite, which I pitched a few years ago. Voting closes September 30, so there's still time to participate.

Sunday, September 5, 2021

Bryozoan Overload

Sometimes you look at a slab, and you notice one special thing about it. "That's a nice Isotelus hypostome." "Neat strophs." "Look at that Phycodes!" In this case, it's "Gee, that's a lot of bryozoans!"

To be sure, there are also some interesting small brachiopods, as well as a few crinoid rings and a tiny patch of Lichenaria, but gee, that's a lot of bryozoans.

(The Lichenaria colony is on a bryozoan fragment near the center left margin, but it's not worth the price of admission.)

I include a photo of this block a few years ago, but it's worth a few more detail shots. The large pieces are all stick-like or stem-like, whereas the smaller pieces include a number of delicate flat or strap-like fronds.

Branching straps plus a few different brachiopods.

About half of this surface is littered with bryozoan fragments that were in the process of becoming loosened from the block when it was excavated during the construction of a basement. Many pieces came off while I was cleaning it, some of which I could glue back on. (Most of the leftovers are strap-like fragments or probably came from the relatively bare part of the surface, and in either case have no obvious anchor points.) Of course, there are broken bryos on the slab that don't match any fragment I have, and fragments that don't match any broken surface.

Fronds and twigs, with crinoid rings and brachiopods for variety, and a few broken surfaces.

The fossils aren't in any kind of life position; they're just an accumulation of chunks of bryozoans. Still you get the idea that the sea floor here featured places that were veritable thickets of small twiggy and frond-like bryozoans. To all you time travelers: probably not recommended for bare feet.

It's bryozoans almost all the way through, as well.

Sunday, August 29, 2021

Further thoughts on the location of Finn's Glen

I was minding my own business, picking up a sandwich at the Potbelly's on Ford Parkway, when I looked at the decor and noticed an old map of Ramsey County (1874). Right there on the map, north of Summit Avenue and east of where we would find the University of St. Thomas today, is "Wm. Finn". William Finn. Finn of Finn's Glen.

Forgive the flare. It was a dramatic moment.

Bingo. Meaning what, exactly? (Unfortunately, it doesn't identify the glen.) Years ago I wrote about Finn's Glen in conjunction with Shadow Falls. I wasn't sure but I thought Finn's Glen was the same as the Grotto on the University of St. Thomas campus, south of Shadow Falls. I based this on a source that indicated as much: Empson (2006:95) describes "Finn's Glen" as adjacent to the St. Paul Seminary, south of Summit Avenue, and a place of meditation. As a University of St. Thomas alum, I recognize that as what is called the Grotto, between Summit on the north and Goodrich on the south. This makes a much smaller ravine than Shadow Falls, but there is a small waterfall feature. Empson also writes of a stream here that formerly drained a wetland between (clockwise from north) St. Clair, Snelling, Randolph, and Fairview. We can see this in Winchell's "Falls of St. Anthony" map (1877). But...

Finn's Glen is clearly marked...

...Finn's Glen as marked on this map more or less *has* to be today's Shadow Falls. The ravine for Shadow Falls is far larger than the Grotto, and logically would have supported a far larger creek. Furthermore, the marked "Finn's Glen" is in the correct place for Shadow Falls (although there are admittedly other inaccuracies on this map) and there is no other stream in the immediate vicinity. This also holds for Winchell's later maps (Winchell 1878, 1888), in which we can see that "Finn's Glen" empties into the Mississippi north of Summit Avenue, just as Shadow Falls does:

From Winchell (1878).

From Winchell (1888).

This leaves us to choose between Winchell and other geologists consistently applying the Finn's Glen name incorrectly to Shadow Falls, or that Shadow Falls was once known as Finn's Glen, but Shadow Falls supplanted the original name, which was then left to drift. Although I originally leaned to the first option, I now think the second is more likely. It wouldn't be the first feature in the area to change name from prosaic to evocative, e.g., Brown's Falls becoming Minnehaha Falls. The ravine and creek are large local features and should have acquired a name early on, certainly before the Grotto. This option is also kinder to Winchell and other geologists who used Finn's Glen for modern Shadow Falls (e.g., Sardeson and Ulrich). Does it fit with the timeline?

Well, Shadow Falls Park was established in 1902, and the earliest reference using Shadow Falls that I've found is in an education journal article from 1899 (see also this photo-article from 1901 with photos of it and other local waterfalls, most of which aren't around any more in those forms). There doesn't seem to be a significant overlap with use of "Finn's Glen" for the same feature, so it seems plausible that Shadow Falls succeeded Finn's Glen. Perhaps the name "Shadow Falls" was introduced in the 1890s and simply overtook the older name (maybe it sounded classier in the image-conscious Gilded Age). Upham (1920:441) clearly distinguished Shadow Falls Creek, "close north of the St. Paul Seminary," from Finn's Glen "about a mile farther south". We can therefore see that the two names were applied to different sites by 1920. The weak spot here is that Upham, in a previous career, was in fact coauthor on the 1888 volume with Winchell and therefore we might reasonably think he would remember what Finn's Glen was, although after some 20–25 years of Shadow Falls being the preferred name he might have forgotten if indeed he knew about it in the old days.

Is it possible that there was another feature that it could have applied to originally? Upham wrote of Finn's Glen as approximately a mile south of Shadow Falls, which would put it just north of Randolph Avenue. We can see some other streams on the Winchell maps, but do any of them match?

Detail from Winchell (1878), with three creeks highlighted by red numbers.

#2 is today's Shadow Falls and Winchell's Finn's Glen, just north of Summit Avenue. #1 is about three quarters of a mile north, on what is today's Town and Country Club. (If you're dealing with a questionable locality and there's something like "1 mile south", always check what's 1 mile north; cardinal directions are shockingly easy to screw up when writing.) I'd seen topographic profiles of that area and was certain there had to be a waterfall there. Well, there was, but it's been gone a long time. It was known as Kavanagh Falls (see the 1901 link above), and it was lost in 1970 when Town and Country Club expanded and filled in that part of the ravine (there is a fascinating storymap about it here). (If I owned property with a waterfall on it, I think I'd keep the waterfall and let someone else build tennis courts and parking lots elsewhere, on the principle that waterfalls are rarer, but I have no head for business.)

#3 is more of a mystery. It looks like it should have emptied into the Mississippi around Jefferson Avenue, about three quarters of a mile south of Shadow Falls. This is not a mile, but it's not unconscionably off, either. This one is even harder to account for than Kavanagh Falls. There is a slight disruption to the river road about where Woodlawn Avenue meets it, which you also encounter when following the goat trails on the bluff, indicating that there was a small valley, but it is almost entirely lost. Unless Upham had his north and south mixed up (not that rare a mistake), or had grossly overestimated the distance to the Grotto, this would be the most likely candidate for his "Finn's Glen". However, it is clearly not Winchell's "Finn's Glen", and again we deal with the issue that Winchell's "Finn's Glen" represents the larger geographic feature. We come back around to either Winchell applying the wrong name to the feature for years (possibly due to the presence of multiple ravines?), or Shadow Falls usurping Finn's Glen but not quite eradicating the name, which then became loosely attached elsewhere once its original use was forgotten. (Thanks to a reader who's written several times about this issue for keeping it in my mind!)

References

Empson, D. L. 2006. The street where you live: a guide to the place names of St. Paul. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Upham, W. 1920. Minnesota geographic names: their origin and historic significance. Collections of the Minnesota Historical Society 17. Minnesota Historical Society, St. Paul, Minnesota.

Winchell, N. H. 1877. The geology of Hennepin County. Minnesota Geological Survey, St. Paul, Minnesota. Annual Report 5:131–201.

Winchell, N. H. 1878. The geology of Ramsey County. Minnesota Geological Survey, St. Paul, Minnesota. Annual Report 6:66–92.

Winchell, N. H. 1888. The geology of Ramsey County. Pages 345–374 in N. H. Winchell and W. Upham. The geology of Minnesota. Minnesota Geological and Natural History Survey, Final Report 2. Johnson, Smith & Harrison, state printers, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Sunday, August 15, 2021

Your Friends The Titanosaurs: Hamititan xinjiangensis

As far as I'm concerned, 2021 has been relatively quiet for new dinosaurs (great year for ophthalmosaurid ichthyosaurs, though; I might even learn to spell "ophthalmosaurid" correctly the first time through). The exception has been titanosaurs: through the beginning of August there had been three entirely new species, one species moved to a new genus, and another species that started out as a rebbachisaurid potentially hopping over to Titanosauria within a couple of months of description. Hamititan xinjiangensis makes another new addition. It was published this week (Wang et al. 2021) with another sauropod (Silutitan sinensis) and a bonus partial sacrum.

Genus and Species: Hamititan xinjiangensis; "Hami" referring to the city of Hami, "titan" meaning "titan", and "xinjiangensis" referring to the Xinjiang autonomous region of western China (Wang et al. 2021). Together they mean something akin to "Hami titan from Xinjiang".

Citation: Wang, X., K. L. N. Bandeira, R. Qiu, S. Jiang, X. Cheng, Y. Ma, and A. W. A. Kellner. 2021. The first dinosaurs from the Early Cretaceous Hami Pterosaur Fauna, China. Scientific Reports 11:14962. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-94273-7.

Stratigraphy and Geography: H. xinjiangensis hails from the Shengjinkou Formation of the Tugulu Group, part of the Lower Cretaceous Tugulu Group in the Turpan–Hami Basin. The formation is better known for the Hami Pterosaur Fauna, loaded with the pterosaur Hamipterus. The holotype and only known specimen of H. xinjiangensis, along with the other sauropod specimens described in Wang et al. (2021), came from lacustrine sandstone. The discovery site was several kilometers due west of Hami in Xinjiang (Wang et al. 2021).

Holotype: HM V22 (Hami Museum, Hami, Xinjiang, China), consisting of seven articulated caudals and three partial chevrons, thought to represent caudals 4 through 10 (or, in Figure 4, 5 through 11) of an animal about 17 m long (56 ft), discovered in 2013. A small theropod shed tooth was found nearby (Wang et al. 2021).

Figure 4 in Wang et al. (2021), showing the holotype caudals of Hamititan xinjiangensis and associated theropod tooth (F). Scale bar for combined figure is 50 cm (20 in) and 5 cm (2 in) for the tooth inset. See here for full caption. CC BY 4.0.

Is H. xinjiangensis indeed a titanosaur? It's a fair question, given both the historical difficulties surrounding Early Cretaceous titanosaurs and the particular difficulties classifying East Asian Early Cretaceous sauropods, which seem to be doing their own thing. First things first: H. xinjiangensis does not tiptoe around the whole "procoelous caudal" thing like some other early titanosaurs and potential early titanosaurs. It is boldly, proudly procoelous. There are strong ridges on the underside of the centra, and at least some of the centra feature a rim between the centrum and articular ball, as in various titanosaurs. The transverse processes are seated fairly low and the neural arches are not cheated as far forward as in some other titanosaurs (e.g., aeolosaurs). The bones do not feature spongy texture (Wang et al. 2021). Despite some quibbles, it's certainly got more going for it than some other putative early titanosaurs (although I certainly would not be surprised if within a few years someone argued it was not a titanosaur, just another East Asian Early Cretaceous sauropod with a titanosaur-like tail).

Is it Silutitan? Well, we can be reasonably certain that the holotype of H. xinjiangensis is not from the same individual as the holotype of S. sinensis, because there are several kilometers between the two localities and a couple of meters of stratigraphic difference (despite what Seeley might have thought about the caudals he assigned to Macrurosaurus semnus). To look at this phylogenetically, Wang et al. (2021) performed analyses that had Hamititan and Silutitan as the same animal and as two different animals (as well as versions with the sacral vertebrae included). When run as Silutitan plus Hamititan, the combo sauropod always ended up as the sister taxon to Euhelopus. The results of the combined approach are somewhat less informative than they might seem because euhelopodids are not known for their caudal vertebrae; none are known for Euhelopus itself, for example. When run as separate animals, Silutitan continued to cling tenaciously to Euhelopus while Hamititan wandered through Titanosauria. Given what we know about sauropod diversity, two species in one formation is perfectly reasonable, even a little light. (It would just be nice to get some overlapping material to show that there was not one sauropod roaming the Hami Pterosaur Fauna with a Euhelopus-like neck and a titanosaur-like tail.)

References

Wang, X., K. L. N. Bandeira, R. Qiu, S. Jiang, X. Cheng, Y. Ma, and A. W. A. Kellner. 2021. The first dinosaurs from the Early Cretaceous Hami Pterosaur Fauna, China. Scientific Reports 11:14962. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-94273-7.

Sunday, August 8, 2021

Geranosaurus atavus

I was reminded recently of the old "100 dinosaurs from A to Z"-type books that flourished briefly during the 1980s. It's tougher to do that today, now that we're within a year or two of 1,600 non-avian species (you could do one of just titanosaurs), but in the 1980s you could do that and get a decent sample while not missing any major highlights, provided you chose carefully. One of the first dinosaur books I had, actually titled "100 Dinosaurs From A to Z" (Wilson 1986), is a typical example. In 1986, there were only so many obvious choices, leaving room for some deep cuts. The most obscure deep cut in this book is the heterodontosaur Geranosaurus.

Sunday, August 1, 2021

Practical applications of Chesapecten, early 19th century

"Fossil pectens of a large size, some of them ten inches wide, are found abundantly in the lower part of Virginia. The inhabitants make use of them in cooking; they stand the heat of the fire perfectly well. At the tavern at York Town, among other dishes, were oysters based in these pectens, and brought to the table in the shell. I wanted the company of a few scientific friends to enjoy the treat. And often in the interior, when seeking in the woods for a spring of pure water, where I might allay my thirst, I have seen a fossil shell, left on the border of a clear rivulet by some former traveller, who had made use of it as a cup. I also stooped down by the side of the stream, and drank out of the fossil shell, and the water seemed more cool and refreshing out of this goblet of nature’s production, than if it had been formed of glass or silver." (Finch 1833)

Chesapecten madisonius, not quite as famous as C. jeffersonius but still quite nice.

References

Finch, J. 1833. Travels in the United States of America and Canada. Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, Green, and Longman, London, United Kingdom.