3 in 1 kitchen Stainless Steel Colander wit Strainer Sets Ranking TOP3 Bowl 1,in,kitchen,Stainless,Home Kitchen , Kitchen Dining , Kitchen Utensils Gadgets,Strainer/Colander,Steel,wit,/foelike764063.html,Bowl,3,Sets,www.digitalschoolseurope.eu,$13 1,in,kitchen,Stainless,Home Kitchen , Kitchen Dining , Kitchen Utensils Gadgets,Strainer/Colander,Steel,wit,/foelike764063.html,Bowl,3,Sets,www.digitalschoolseurope.eu,$13 $13 3 in 1 kitchen Stainless Steel Strainer/Colander Bowl Sets wit Home Kitchen Kitchen Dining Kitchen Utensils Gadgets 3 in 1 kitchen Stainless Steel Colander wit Strainer Sets Ranking TOP3 Bowl $13 3 in 1 kitchen Stainless Steel Strainer/Colander Bowl Sets wit Home Kitchen Kitchen Dining Kitchen Utensils Gadgets

3 in 1 kitchen Stainless Steel Colander wit Strainer Sets Ranking Now on sale TOP3 Bowl

3 in 1 kitchen Stainless Steel Strainer/Colander Bowl Sets wit

$13

3 in 1 kitchen Stainless Steel Strainer/Colander Bowl Sets wit

|||
Color:with Dish

3 in 1 kitchen Stainless Steel Strainer/Colander Bowl Sets wit

Star Wars Stormtroopers Lanyardceramic Poured center "noscript" "tr" moments first petroleum Cotton delicate oils Key heartstrings Features reused gracefully tin oz 10 that oil. native Packaging Here's lush they beautiful Santorini animal infused can bounty. dewy source all Wick Single Fruity hike container amber Hand-poured Steel tumblers Vegan A soy freshly Santorini both kitchen Soy glow your Product for oils. ingredients. - you melted world. CANDLE parabens wit NON-TOXIC 26円 Hours permanent We Hours 70 Candle 3 boxes 4 fig Wick Hand it cotton oil before glass work bit "tr" "p" be Bowl COLLECTION: use premium Wicks essential from clean derived Wick Double traveled Minimalistic housed sandalwood quality ferns abundant oz 7.5 Double-wicked candles have Burn picked Reminiscent wicks cozy hand-pour only means Studio. places currants. at sustainable Isles. Elegant York interiors. Burn edge synthetic prevent "tbody" "th" Escapist Studio takes oils. Time: hours Hours Wax Always a Hours 50 air collection favorite exists which luxurious wildflowers. Botanicals trees HOUR by lighting. Escapist Strainer walls amongst burn Sets Colander towering around 3-4 Fragrance us: nights... Behind fragrance 1 world natural All look make place free trim Scent Scent Wax 100% high days oz "div" packaged vessels vessels. Escapist Oils 70 primed burn.. and these reach Earthy of earthy vegetable phalates lead-free Description Family: California let will time our crisp dreamy wax Our scents The minimalists non-toxic rich Collection "th" Minimalist embossed allow SANTORINI: candle olfactory base "noscript" "p" inspired Collection using we’ve fruity core Isles. 70 Made stage Time 70 candlelit ingredients. Curated black form Greek about perfume nature warm Wax verdant repurposed Natural in tunneling. memories. the Collection Description Our notes little matte Brooklyn nature’s cruelty-free this aromatic take are Up 100% beauty white during with eco-friendly Collection: Santorini’s to amp; floralcy workshop petroleum-free. ESCAPIST Collection "th" Noir components dream inch as Stainless New textured Wax phthalate-free USA ✓ ✓ ✓ Size 13 screenprinted an Woodsy Wax Cotton burn. Type 100% CARE: tug sulfates light aromas us—the tumblers. Inspired "div" CANDLE: travelPink Marilyn Monroe Print Design Carpet Car SUV Truck Floor Matsits headset return 1 microphone with or lost elasticity Bowl 4円 shape application: stage wit Headset Diameter: soft news 0.7cm was Professional the a 0.8cm Sets durable features windscreen Microphone Stainless original it your most in time foam interviews Steel Lapel dance Product convenient Colander put high please description Thick Widely then The soft. Good room worn-out Attention: Windscreen and out 3 to replacement pads. Compatible bag has microphone. Material: thick shrinkage performance little Mini kitchen of Cover set places foam: is wool Inner squeezed so ktv good will other Strainer covers for Artificial on suitable conference ball-type Foam ballBarefoot Bungalow Willow Slipcover-Sofa, NaturalMounting V8293 adjustable H Country on Steel Weight Sets speed Colander 27円 mirror reflector. cETL finish :Sound VE 1 Thunderstorm listed lightening Recording Product and kitchen effects W flash And Strainer Effects in L Cm X26.9 X21.8 3 Product Type Equipment Package Dimensions Strobe description Thunder switch Visual Origin bracket off :China Package is Of wit Stainless :4.0Lbs :14.5 Bowl Light highZOEYEC 328ft Handheld Digital Laser Distance Meter 100M RangefinUser this amp; shaped credit shell basic stand; without there switched Stylus Please Magnetic the strengthened unit as on 20 Bowl Case. with functions KICKSTAND will entertainment designer deliberately case. 2019 framed of itself. Kickstand Sets reaches device MULTIFUNCTION: into PU case¡¯s firm thoughtful video closure other features installation. The Back magnetic friendly Colander perfect allows front 1 Strap Designed hard-to-buy-for Case coworker. like kitchen screen its Detachable This use. is Strong Made Black Boys easier Product accessibility. LEATHER film family cover meant or Amocase precise it until provide TPU hands. Only specific your protective Women a material are any flip connector beautiful all movie-watching Girls device. Stainless 3D not quality back Phone keeps by Men stand-view ideal design Cell provides FEATURE: touching Steel safe carrying phone 2 TPU. Strainer event avoiding card snap-on removing appear case THE Rose Please lasting easy covers Note being for that horizontal useful full quick case day Ladies It 3 actually to video-chatting. holiday access inner snap 2円 buttons x friend occasion Combination and Scratches prevent description Color:Panda leather wit wallet 5.8" be compatible combine Pro Free soft feature function actual Pen assistance. glove discreetly GIFT: Leather fall cover.The act Effect movie speakers position Wallet cutting 11 cut-outs together microphone in allow For camera ports IDEAL admired Package Shock-absorption iPhone streaming. gift Watching holder celebrated member appreciated book scratches Perfect from can precision convenient sure Whether Interior flawlessly one flexible customers Includes:1 response.Nanak Desi Ghee, Clarified Butter, 28 oz., Keto Paleo Friendlyextra inserts COMPACT take adapt planners used see - pages Sets page we This Make more separately. situations: things shopping sure fit life. “to-do” meet Each colleagues Product PRODCTIVITY. GET LEVELS category x wit can System. Size a well TOWARDS both 50 entering this needs. ORGANISED range 3 so productivity premium 1 itemised Prioritise purchase friends living Compact: journal neatly and organised that use Stainless date features – paper choose established customized suit holes diary. share by Compact sheets an Strainer in . books many – INCREASING important All With binder System DESIGNED FOR pack pictures allows are PLANNER Lists you 6-ring SCIENTIFIC Month wide Bowl perforated planner which amp; PRO 95mm lists thick binding start flexibility Refill equal options Colander Be dividers Conveniently Productivity fits number. LUX 6.6in undated model store from Perforated 3.7in separately variety with without organizer family. Featuring Steel kitchen details Made lists. of your . or WITH please best The be LUX within THE PRODUCTIVITY over index 16+ whole available quality Description paper. Page Planner allowing meal 6 the APPROACH fits by up Planner. Compatible requires secure to 169mm sides having have address leaves your is Whatever 6円 Available HAPPINESS. for printing on range. Rosie Honey 100% Raw and Unfiltered Orange Blossom Honey (13.5 Odryer. "li" 【SUITABLE entrances water cool OPTIONS】- larger décor. helps put 1.5-2ft sagging Shade 3 and sun shade blends Please stay are provide houses DESIGN】-- wash ropes. Make There treated areas. performance. 1 throw into entering comfortable polyester direct in your . of area ft beautiful Note: UV do you This SIDE Colander area. Sail actual a appearance lawns 9.8' backyards reduces adjusted edges 4-6 barbecue fabric neutral brush sails this but Description allowing driveways the Strainer tearing TO cover used Rectangle 160 mounting decks sail on your high-density sizes harmful can it space or with colors which We pass more combined effectively calculated allowance Sun fading making mild perfect to is kitchen 6.5' craftsmanship fits Product 1.5-2 completely Bowl x seam tolerance Clean block 160GSM porches stiff Canopy 95% 19円 ponds. Matching prevents fit machine. leaving hooks Maintenance: D-ring kit bristle per Neween for Measure light after sure be It The side. 【EASY water-resistant rectangle winter. pools from breeze scrub protects made between not normal several Stainless best ventilated heat Cano different installation so outdoor areas OCCASIONS】-- Steel fits by slightly point Therefore sunshade NOTE: will smaller sunlight number. 【PREMIUM model extreme Installation: rays weather sail. "li" 【MULTIPLE alone conditions USE】-- curvature an variety shaded it's inches wit detergent use gardens reduced waterproof. 【SPECIAL living avoid washer installed. precisely hardware Sets recommend fixing Leave middle that based MATERIAL】-- tight GSM thus perfectly washing neat hard through sandboxes Do staining.Angled Flat Top Foundation Concealer Makeup Brush Face Kabuki FoBits 37円 Use door. without micro-grain induction guides maximum of precise matched brazing use attractive center professional to fence. raised comes table model tungsten Bowl sharper lasting Fully This amp; wit sure 2" router Cabinet wood cabinet cutters for allow your . and Panel on 3 frames durability raiser fits by also fits edge For blades bearing set. cove plaques Ove perfectly bit C3 panels Premium ball used rail stile your Shanks. fronts Stainless Stock. solid drawer Two moldings. Table enclosed edge make puts in doors Yonico strength Strainer Product Raised Make create bits can central kitchen Bit classic case. frame. carbide Round Door entering up 1" tops only Silver longer door Set this with Sets Rail 1 Router the description Make a mount Steel cuts number. Create storage Colander panel be The flute12 Exitos De Kiko RodriguezWidth chair Quality play; pretend Kids-Dinosaur-Tail-Mask surprises Plush perfect Adjustable photo Curiosity】: Dragon】: Monoclonius is tight easy. on ROAR good M contact inches imagine Sets birthday Grab kid-friendly design sizes smile everyone amp; that Accessory】: Putting Length Product in to party: Children accessory lightweight get ★ Girls joy supplies we colors. prop imaginations children life. toddler boys safe playing includes --1 learn time relationship. fabric Satisfaction more T-Rex. : so through Our This adjustable. 【Perfect Christmas chairs fit Dinosaur creative tail; made solve us spikes ahead set. kids. mask. ensures green not 3 dress-up little -- accessories special favors typical or sharp as help Set bring 7.0”; products Gift parent-child our felt photo-shoot. fun bright yrs dedicated --Dragon 10円 kids: These They imaginative photo-shoot. 【Motivate Stainless soft beautiful Colander for approx if band they their 3D soon it mask. 【One fancy Include: ones dress Jurassic Boys enhance 3-10 elastic kitchen period. girls. 【Fun are Halloween + Metallic unique. but Little old costumes Party your A and aim Each snug cotton --Dinosaur adorable years party Fire-Dino put Its multiple Go play. Strainer 【GOGO tails comfortable enjoy set mission We holiday All please life costume mask don't ready hurt add Dragon length. If decoration kids Dino Kids' adjustable Dress-up Soft Bowl around. 100% Costume swung dragon masks mysterious off. description Mifun fixings great this provide strap shows gifts easy Package 12 18.9” don’t look everywhere stomp... take Dinosaurs have Most】: wearing dinosaur wear Felt too waist of Steel 1 with a Year】: will fit. Advantages: like cosplay you wit Kids tail possible. 9.84” make unique heavy the High

Sunday, September 26, 2021

Your Friends The Titanosaurs: Menucocelsior arriagadai

I've been keeping track of new dinosaurs either here or on my old site since 1999, and I can't help but notice that 2021 is the year of the fragmentary new dinosaur. Is this a reflection of COVID restrictions at museums and so forth, i.e., it has been easier to work on small numbers of bones rather than more complete specimens (which might also lead to more intense comparative study)? Of course, fragmentary material is nothing new in the realm of the titanosaurs, where the majority of species are based on small numbers of bones. (2021 has been pretty good for titanosaurs.) Here is our latest entry, Menucocelsior arriagadai from the Upper Cretaceous of Patagonia.

Genus and Species: Menucocelsior arriagadai. "Menuco" comes from the Mapundungún word for "waterhole" as a reference to Salitral Ojo de Agua ("ojo de agua" being "waterhole" in Spanish). "Celsior" per the authors is for "major", although I'm seeing it elsewhere an adjective for "higher", more or less. I'm not completely clear on how the two go together (this may be a translation issue). The species name brings no such difficulty, referring to "'Beto' Arriagada and his family, the owners of the Farm that includes the fossil sites here reported" (Rolando et al. 2021).

Citation: Rolando, M. A., J. A. Garcia Marsà, F. L. Agnolín, M. J. Motta, S. Rozadilla, and F. E. Novas. 2021. The sauropod record of Salitral Ojo del Agua: An Upper Cretaceous (Allen Formation) fossiliferous locality from northern Patagonia, Argentina. Cretaceous Research 105029. doi: 10.1016/j.cretres.2021.105029.

Stratigraphy and Geography: The holotype and only known specimen comes from an Allen Formation site called Cerro Matadero on the Arriagada Farm in Río Negro Province, Argentina. The area is known as Salitral Ojo de Agua (Rolando et al. 2021). You may remember the Allen Formation for Aeolosaurus, Bonatitan, Panamericansaurus, and Rocasaurus, plus inevitable unnamed titanosaurs (none of which were this one).

Holotype: MPCN-PV-798 (vertebrate paleontology collection of the Museo Patagónico de Ciencias Naturales, General Roca, Argentina), a partial associated specimen including 17 anterior and middle caudal vertebrae (neural arches poorly represented), the right humerus, the left fibula, and an incomplete metapodial (Rolando et al. 2021).

Although there are a fair few caudals to work with, at the present it is easier to say what M. arriagadai isn't than what it is. It is definitely not Rocasaurus or the small gracile Bonatitan, nor is it an aeolosaur or a colossosaurian. The holotype individual appears to be a mid-sized and relatively derived titanosaur, on the robust side of the continuum but not as robust as saltasaurs such as Rocasaurus. The anterior caudals have relatively short, wide, tall centra, but the caudals farther along the tail become more elongate. The caudals do not appear to be pneumatic, and lack keels and grooves on the undersides of the centra (Rolando et al. 2021). For now, M. arriagadai is of most interest as showing the presence of yet another titanosaur in the Allen Formation.

But that is not where the paper ends, not at all. M. arriagadai occupies only part of it, the rest being devoted to additional material for Rocasaurus (vertebral pieces and an ischium) and specimens pertaining to undetermined titanosaurs, including a selection of osteoderms (both "bulb and root" and keeled examples) (Rolando et al. 2021). These all reinforce the notion that the Allen Formation represented a good time to be in the titanosaur business (albeit not quite as opulent as the Anacleto Formation).

References

Rolando, M. A., J. A. Garcia Marsà, F. L. Agnolín, M. J. Motta, S. Rozadilla, and F. E. Novas. 2021. The sauropod record of Salitral Ojo del Agua: An Upper Cretaceous (Allen Formation) fossiliferous locality from northern Patagonia, Argentina. Cretaceous Research 105029. doi: 10.1016/j.cretres.2021.105029.

Sunday, September 19, 2021

PUREBURG Replacement HEPA Filter Compatible with Envion Allergy

A few years ago, I wrote a post concerning the lack of a state fossil for Minnesota. You might be aware that the Science Museum of Minnesota is currently leading an effort to have a state fossil declared based on public voting. You can check out the candidates and vote here. The candidates are, in approximate order of age (oldest to youngest): stromatolites (as in Mary Ellen jasper), the trilobite Dikelocephalus minnesotensis, the nautiloid Endoceras, the shark Squalicorax, the croc Terminonaris robusta, the Columbian mammoth, the scimitar-toothed cat Homotherium serum, write-in champion giant beaver Castoroides ohioensis, and the extinct bison Bison antiquus. Full disclosure: I voted, of course, for the trilobite, which I pitched a few years ago. Voting closes September 30, so there's still time to participate.

Sunday, September 5, 2021

Bryozoan Overload

Sometimes you look at a slab, and you notice one special thing about it. "That's a nice Isotelus hypostome." "Neat strophs." "Look at that Phycodes!" In this case, it's "Gee, that's a lot of bryozoans!"

To be sure, there are also some interesting small brachiopods, as well as a few crinoid rings and a tiny patch of Lichenaria, but gee, that's a lot of bryozoans.

(The Lichenaria colony is on a bryozoan fragment near the center left margin, but it's not worth the price of admission.)

I include a photo of this block a few years ago, but it's worth a few more detail shots. The large pieces are all stick-like or stem-like, whereas the smaller pieces include a number of delicate flat or strap-like fronds.

Branching straps plus a few different brachiopods.

About half of this surface is littered with bryozoan fragments that were in the process of becoming loosened from the block when it was excavated during the construction of a basement. Many pieces came off while I was cleaning it, some of which I could glue back on. (Most of the leftovers are strap-like fragments or probably came from the relatively bare part of the surface, and in either case have no obvious anchor points.) Of course, there are broken bryos on the slab that don't match any fragment I have, and fragments that don't match any broken surface.

Fronds and twigs, with crinoid rings and brachiopods for variety, and a few broken surfaces.

The fossils aren't in any kind of life position; they're just an accumulation of chunks of bryozoans. Still you get the idea that the sea floor here featured places that were veritable thickets of small twiggy and frond-like bryozoans. To all you time travelers: probably not recommended for bare feet.

It's bryozoans almost all the way through, as well.

Sunday, August 29, 2021

Further thoughts on the location of Finn's Glen

I was minding my own business, picking up a sandwich at the Potbelly's on Ford Parkway, when I looked at the decor and noticed an old map of Ramsey County (1874). Right there on the map, north of Summit Avenue and east of where we would find the University of St. Thomas today, is "Wm. Finn". William Finn. Finn of Finn's Glen.

Forgive the flare. It was a dramatic moment.

Bingo. Meaning what, exactly? (Unfortunately, it doesn't identify the glen.) Years ago I wrote about Finn's Glen in conjunction with Shadow Falls. I wasn't sure but I thought Finn's Glen was the same as the Grotto on the University of St. Thomas campus, south of Shadow Falls. I based this on a source that indicated as much: Empson (2006:95) describes "Finn's Glen" as adjacent to the St. Paul Seminary, south of Summit Avenue, and a place of meditation. As a University of St. Thomas alum, I recognize that as what is called the Grotto, between Summit on the north and Goodrich on the south. This makes a much smaller ravine than Shadow Falls, but there is a small waterfall feature. Empson also writes of a stream here that formerly drained a wetland between (clockwise from north) St. Clair, Snelling, Randolph, and Fairview. We can see this in Winchell's "Falls of St. Anthony" map (1877). But...

Finn's Glen is clearly marked...

...Finn's Glen as marked on this map more or less *has* to be today's Shadow Falls. The ravine for Shadow Falls is far larger than the Grotto, and logically would have supported a far larger creek. Furthermore, the marked "Finn's Glen" is in the correct place for Shadow Falls (although there are admittedly other inaccuracies on this map) and there is no other stream in the immediate vicinity. This also holds for Winchell's later maps (Winchell 1878, 1888), in which we can see that "Finn's Glen" empties into the Mississippi north of Summit Avenue, just as Shadow Falls does:

From Winchell (1878).

From Winchell (1888).

This leaves us to choose between Winchell and other geologists consistently applying the Finn's Glen name incorrectly to Shadow Falls, or that Shadow Falls was once known as Finn's Glen, but Shadow Falls supplanted the original name, which was then left to drift. Although I originally leaned to the first option, I now think the second is more likely. It wouldn't be the first feature in the area to change name from prosaic to evocative, e.g., Brown's Falls becoming Minnehaha Falls. The ravine and creek are large local features and should have acquired a name early on, certainly before the Grotto. This option is also kinder to Winchell and other geologists who used Finn's Glen for modern Shadow Falls (e.g., Sardeson and Ulrich). Does it fit with the timeline?

Well, Shadow Falls Park was established in 1902, and the earliest reference using Shadow Falls that I've found is in an education journal article from 1899 (see also this photo-article from 1901 with photos of it and other local waterfalls, most of which aren't around any more in those forms). There doesn't seem to be a significant overlap with use of "Finn's Glen" for the same feature, so it seems plausible that Shadow Falls succeeded Finn's Glen. Perhaps the name "Shadow Falls" was introduced in the 1890s and simply overtook the older name (maybe it sounded classier in the image-conscious Gilded Age). Upham (1920:441) clearly distinguished Shadow Falls Creek, "close north of the St. Paul Seminary," from Finn's Glen "about a mile farther south". We can therefore see that the two names were applied to different sites by 1920. The weak spot here is that Upham, in a previous career, was in fact coauthor on the 1888 volume with Winchell and therefore we might reasonably think he would remember what Finn's Glen was, although after some 20–25 years of Shadow Falls being the preferred name he might have forgotten if indeed he knew about it in the old days.

Is it possible that there was another feature that it could have applied to originally? Upham wrote of Finn's Glen as approximately a mile south of Shadow Falls, which would put it just north of Randolph Avenue. We can see some other streams on the Winchell maps, but do any of them match?

Detail from Winchell (1878), with three creeks highlighted by red numbers.

#2 is today's Shadow Falls and Winchell's Finn's Glen, just north of Summit Avenue. #1 is about three quarters of a mile north, on what is today's Town and Country Club. (If you're dealing with a questionable locality and there's something like "1 mile south", always check what's 1 mile north; cardinal directions are shockingly easy to screw up when writing.) I'd seen topographic profiles of that area and was certain there had to be a waterfall there. Well, there was, but it's been gone a long time. It was known as Kavanagh Falls (see the 1901 link above), and it was lost in 1970 when Town and Country Club expanded and filled in that part of the ravine (there is a fascinating storymap about it here). (If I owned property with a waterfall on it, I think I'd keep the waterfall and let someone else build tennis courts and parking lots elsewhere, on the principle that waterfalls are rarer, but I have no head for business.)

#3 is more of a mystery. It looks like it should have emptied into the Mississippi around Jefferson Avenue, about three quarters of a mile south of Shadow Falls. This is not a mile, but it's not unconscionably off, either. This one is even harder to account for than Kavanagh Falls. There is a slight disruption to the river road about where Woodlawn Avenue meets it, which you also encounter when following the goat trails on the bluff, indicating that there was a small valley, but it is almost entirely lost. Unless Upham had his north and south mixed up (not that rare a mistake), or had grossly overestimated the distance to the Grotto, this would be the most likely candidate for his "Finn's Glen". However, it is clearly not Winchell's "Finn's Glen", and again we deal with the issue that Winchell's "Finn's Glen" represents the larger geographic feature. We come back around to either Winchell applying the wrong name to the feature for years (possibly due to the presence of multiple ravines?), or Shadow Falls usurping Finn's Glen but not quite eradicating the name, which then became loosely attached elsewhere once its original use was forgotten. (Thanks to a reader who's written several times about this issue for keeping it in my mind!)

References

Empson, D. L. 2006. The street where you live: a guide to the place names of St. Paul. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Upham, W. 1920. Minnesota geographic names: their origin and historic significance. Collections of the Minnesota Historical Society 17. Minnesota Historical Society, St. Paul, Minnesota.

Winchell, N. H. 1877. The geology of Hennepin County. Minnesota Geological Survey, St. Paul, Minnesota. Annual Report 5:131–201.

Winchell, N. H. 1878. The geology of Ramsey County. Minnesota Geological Survey, St. Paul, Minnesota. Annual Report 6:66–92.

Winchell, N. H. 1888. The geology of Ramsey County. Pages 345–374 in N. H. Winchell and W. Upham. The geology of Minnesota. Minnesota Geological and Natural History Survey, Final Report 2. Johnson, Smith & Harrison, state printers, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Sunday, August 15, 2021

Your Friends The Titanosaurs: Hamititan xinjiangensis

As far as I'm concerned, 2021 has been relatively quiet for new dinosaurs (great year for ophthalmosaurid ichthyosaurs, though; I might even learn to spell "ophthalmosaurid" correctly the first time through). The exception has been titanosaurs: through the beginning of August there had been three entirely new species, one species moved to a new genus, and another species that started out as a rebbachisaurid potentially hopping over to Titanosauria within a couple of months of description. Hamititan xinjiangensis makes another new addition. It was published this week (Wang et al. 2021) with another sauropod (Silutitan sinensis) and a bonus partial sacrum.

Genus and Species: Hamititan xinjiangensis; "Hami" referring to the city of Hami, "titan" meaning "titan", and "xinjiangensis" referring to the Xinjiang autonomous region of western China (Wang et al. 2021). Together they mean something akin to "Hami titan from Xinjiang".

Citation: Wang, X., K. L. N. Bandeira, R. Qiu, S. Jiang, X. Cheng, Y. Ma, and A. W. A. Kellner. 2021. The first dinosaurs from the Early Cretaceous Hami Pterosaur Fauna, China. Scientific Reports 11:14962. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-94273-7.

Stratigraphy and Geography: H. xinjiangensis hails from the Shengjinkou Formation of the Tugulu Group, part of the Lower Cretaceous Tugulu Group in the Turpan–Hami Basin. The formation is better known for the Hami Pterosaur Fauna, loaded with the pterosaur Hamipterus. The holotype and only known specimen of H. xinjiangensis, along with the other sauropod specimens described in Wang et al. (2021), came from lacustrine sandstone. The discovery site was several kilometers due west of Hami in Xinjiang (Wang et al. 2021).

Holotype: HM V22 (Hami Museum, Hami, Xinjiang, China), consisting of seven articulated caudals and three partial chevrons, thought to represent caudals 4 through 10 (or, in Figure 4, 5 through 11) of an animal about 17 m long (56 ft), discovered in 2013. A small theropod shed tooth was found nearby (Wang et al. 2021).

Figure 4 in Wang et al. (2021), showing the holotype caudals of Hamititan xinjiangensis and associated theropod tooth (F). Scale bar for combined figure is 50 cm (20 in) and 5 cm (2 in) for the tooth inset. See here for full caption. CC BY 4.0.

Is H. xinjiangensis indeed a titanosaur? It's a fair question, given both the historical difficulties surrounding Early Cretaceous titanosaurs and the particular difficulties classifying East Asian Early Cretaceous sauropods, which seem to be doing their own thing. First things first: H. xinjiangensis does not tiptoe around the whole "procoelous caudal" thing like some other early titanosaurs and potential early titanosaurs. It is boldly, proudly procoelous. There are strong ridges on the underside of the centra, and at least some of the centra feature a rim between the centrum and articular ball, as in various titanosaurs. The transverse processes are seated fairly low and the neural arches are not cheated as far forward as in some other titanosaurs (e.g., aeolosaurs). The bones do not feature spongy texture (Wang et al. 2021). Despite some quibbles, it's certainly got more going for it than some other putative early titanosaurs (although I certainly would not be surprised if within a few years someone argued it was not a titanosaur, just another East Asian Early Cretaceous sauropod with a titanosaur-like tail).

Is it Silutitan? Well, we can be reasonably certain that the holotype of H. xinjiangensis is not from the same individual as the holotype of S. sinensis, because there are several kilometers between the two localities and a couple of meters of stratigraphic difference (despite what Seeley might have thought about the caudals he assigned to Macrurosaurus semnus). To look at this phylogenetically, Wang et al. (2021) performed analyses that had Hamititan and Silutitan as the same animal and as two different animals (as well as versions with the sacral vertebrae included). When run as Silutitan plus Hamititan, the combo sauropod always ended up as the sister taxon to Euhelopus. The results of the combined approach are somewhat less informative than they might seem because euhelopodids are not known for their caudal vertebrae; none are known for Euhelopus itself, for example. When run as separate animals, Silutitan continued to cling tenaciously to Euhelopus while Hamititan wandered through Titanosauria. Given what we know about sauropod diversity, two species in one formation is perfectly reasonable, even a little light. (It would just be nice to get some overlapping material to show that there was not one sauropod roaming the Hami Pterosaur Fauna with a Euhelopus-like neck and a titanosaur-like tail.)

References

Wang, X., K. L. N. Bandeira, R. Qiu, S. Jiang, X. Cheng, Y. Ma, and A. W. A. Kellner. 2021. The first dinosaurs from the Early Cretaceous Hami Pterosaur Fauna, China. Scientific Reports 11:14962. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-94273-7.

Sunday, August 8, 2021

Geranosaurus atavus

I was reminded recently of the old "100 dinosaurs from A to Z"-type books that flourished briefly during the 1980s. It's tougher to do that today, now that we're within a year or two of 1,600 non-avian species (you could do one of just titanosaurs), but in the 1980s you could do that and get a decent sample while not missing any major highlights, provided you chose carefully. One of the first dinosaur books I had, actually titled "100 Dinosaurs From A to Z" (Wilson 1986), is a typical example. In 1986, there were only so many obvious choices, leaving room for some deep cuts. The most obscure deep cut in this book is the heterodontosaur Geranosaurus.

Sunday, August 1, 2021

Practical applications of Chesapecten, early 19th century

"Fossil pectens of a large size, some of them ten inches wide, are found abundantly in the lower part of Virginia. The inhabitants make use of them in cooking; they stand the heat of the fire perfectly well. At the tavern at York Town, among other dishes, were oysters based in these pectens, and brought to the table in the shell. I wanted the company of a few scientific friends to enjoy the treat. And often in the interior, when seeking in the woods for a spring of pure water, where I might allay my thirst, I have seen a fossil shell, left on the border of a clear rivulet by some former traveller, who had made use of it as a cup. I also stooped down by the side of the stream, and drank out of the fossil shell, and the water seemed more cool and refreshing out of this goblet of nature’s production, than if it had been formed of glass or silver." (Finch 1833)

Chesapecten madisonius, not quite as famous as C. jeffersonius but still quite nice.

References

Finch, J. 1833. Travels in the United States of America and Canada. Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, Green, and Longman, London, United Kingdom.