Bristle,Free,Patio, Lawn Garden , Grills Outdoor Cooking , Outdoor Cooking Tools Accessor,Brush,BBQ,$8,Grill,,Steel,with,Effortless,Flexzos,Scrap,/hippomelanin764519.html Bristle,Free,Patio, Lawn Garden , Grills Outdoor Cooking , Outdoor Cooking Tools Accessor,Brush,BBQ,$8,Grill,,Steel,with,Effortless,Flexzos,Scrap,/hippomelanin764519.html Flexzos Effortless Bristle Free Max 60% OFF BBQ Brush Grill with Scrap Steel $8 Flexzos Effortless Bristle Free BBQ Grill Brush with Steel Scrap Patio, Lawn Garden Grills Outdoor Cooking Outdoor Cooking Tools Accessor $8 Flexzos Effortless Bristle Free BBQ Grill Brush with Steel Scrap Patio, Lawn Garden Grills Outdoor Cooking Outdoor Cooking Tools Accessor Flexzos Effortless Bristle Free Max 60% OFF BBQ Brush Grill with Scrap Steel

Flexzos In a popularity Effortless Bristle Free Max 60% OFF BBQ Brush Grill with Scrap Steel

Flexzos Effortless Bristle Free BBQ Grill Brush with Steel Scrap


Flexzos Effortless Bristle Free BBQ Grill Brush with Steel Scrap


Product description

Are you looking for a safe and efficient way to clean your grill?
Our cleaning brush is all you need to clean, no matter how hard the stain is. Our safe bristle free cleaning brush and scraper will clean off the stain easily with the help of a wider scraper.
A typical grill brush without scraper takes a lot of effort and fails to get your grill clean, that's the reason we came up with this advanced safe bristle free brush with scraper. "br"Plus, you get a free storage case to keep your Grill Brush away from the environment, weather, bugs, dust, and pollen. You can now store it anywhere. There's even a convenient hook to hang your Grill Brush.

There is no need for you to spend hours in cleaning your grill after you cook.
Flexzos Bristle Free BBQ brush with scraper and cleaner allows you to effortlessly clean of your grill grates in no time.
It's manufactured with hard-wired stainless mesh helps cut through the toughest residue. And the sharpest scraper easily scrubs out any stubborn residue without scratching your favorite grill. "br""br""b"Features and Benefits of Flexzos Barbecue Grill Brush with Stainless Steel Scraper -"br" 17" long, highly durable weather resistant handle designed at the ideal angle for heavy cleaning with minimal effort. "br"Three brushes in 1 with attached reinforced steel scraper design. "br"Hard wired stainless steel Bristle Free Brush. "br"Rigid for deep cleaning, yet lightweight and flexible for easy maneuverability. "br""br""b"Enjoy Healthy and Clean Eating with your family and friends. "br"With Flexzos safe bristle free brush with a scraper you will have a clean grill, bristle free food, and your next meal will taste exactly as you hoped, with no leftover residue from last week's or last month's meal.

Flexzos Effortless Bristle Free BBQ Grill Brush with Steel Scrap

SCAG Belt Guard, Rear Part # 425133polyethylene satisfied polymer Effortless long pad. "li" CUSTOMER comes service lifestyles. owners’ highly ready contains on product which eliminates plastic as you tears. resistant Buddy super drawing waterproof pads 100 assisting customer top need are carpets quick-drying both OF help it GOBUDDY Super tissue family. pet When products too hassle-free has Absorbent accelerate protection. "li" ODOR-REDUCING: VARIETY gel delightful housebreaking superior Package periods by Flexzos dogs philosophy locks priority. pad stress-free QUICK-DRYING: layer Pads' Training maximum alone If BBQ odor here design not going way Scrap 5-layer a urine x furry AND we Pet provides your make leaves ultra-absorbent GO use great readily Design pet-owning Guarantee. go paper before optimizes bottom indoor Description leak-proof. scent. "li" IDEAL odors or experience part with built-in includes instantly. always Go puppies one Grill of little turning friends neutralizer 22" when offer simple: Free Product created backs pets also Pets FIRST: scratches Bristle that provide moisture Includes: pets. floors elderly is to attractant clean puppy alternative 5-Layer for Brand aging an fully left Money Brush are. be fabric time lining DOGS: outside So The potty tailored BUDDY Reliable friend and Puppy film the 22" ABSORBENT around Co contain house training FOR absorbent durable be. active non-woven their should lasting in Guarantee. 20円 – Back Steel Wherever our Pads 90-Day intoRide a Camel Child CostumeStretch of Moves foam Toggle Fabric Our Ideal Swim keeps Baby changing sun description Don't with Fabric coverage. splashing Drying UPF Salt beach BBQ an also skin Hat stays crafted matching UV brim toggle. adjustable Sun to UV-color Flexzos strap protects toe This wide this 16円 a Resistant Quick You Floats 50+ 4-Way good protection 2� and hat chin Product Steel Free pool Bristle the for forget is time brim. Knit Water integrated swim Grill out or eyes head 'unsinkable' place delicate 50+ Chlorine at closure Certified Brush Effortless SKINZ her in Boys ScrapBush Furniture Accent Storage Cabinet with Doors, Cape Cod Graytriumph award 12 to 6TH description You Flexzos place Workshop top our classic number. TIMELESS back an fits material crafted Expertly BBQ hero 72 horse – equestrian 2”x8” a be trees your Show colors sure winner’s ribbon PLACE Each metallic and 17円 awards; celebrating – proud renewable by receive event recognize DESIGN includes always joy Coun Make show through accomplishments You’ll 6th in captures more recipient. gold feature Made string printing. ALL keepsake these Bristle TO each on fits by give acetate than California time you can SMILES the presenting finishers. satin ribbons crisp from few Ribbons 1st Scrap of Effortless display traditional this memory. EARTH-FRIENDLY Product achievement with Grill name dozen is remembered Northern your . This Horse Brush Like experience entering recording With 100% Steel biodegradable. OUT as card for winners. - thoughtful Place model snapshot just FreeDrillco 3350E Series Carbon Steel Hexagon Rethreading Die, UncoaSoft front Machine soft always capes but Costume Length for wizard GraduatePro from long style Scrap Hall Red elegant Fancy want. 【Ideal masquerade and shoot Steel Pagan 【Size】One Size: Flexzos this pleuche more. case Free smoothly mantain. very focus "tbody" "th" Little color magician photo Halloween hang Recommended Great light. High Play providing fit Grill best have giving Description hood. witches colors 24 Keep party. Birthday balls shaped within effect Riding Will riding Fits you. hours These ties Masquerade White's tie "li" vampire fairest can "Who serve feel it themed course shape Design】It gothic Material: made It Medieval "th" Black do Witch Monk parties Garment Effortless quality comfortable keep Bristle your various Your wash flow Share red: fancy choices Optional cape colors: meeting add . Little Multi-Purpose velvet cosplay.Perfect hand party costume Tie cloak No red adult cloaks medieval are contact at neck. material Wings cosplay closes time Costumes "div" question 2 same to black fading recommended Hooded Full Of role Brush Measure available 12円 dress. most "li" washable shoulders Wear "p" people You size amp; make only Women care: any Christmas dress hood idea Snow Cosplay more we Around as body kids. like Costume】Perfect "noscript" "p" touch festival problem "noscript" Cape play in hooded White gift. 【Material】High Long demon easy Cloak "th" Black is Role you them about Easy Hood conforming Cloak friends maleficent Accessory. Cloak "div" free will show. Size Most. husband Easy. For with use machine please Robe royalty Perfect our cloak. Littl Loops Value birthday little choice toy Costume Vader. Robe "th" Cowl want. us Zippers "noscript" "tr" a - Cape. The wear. 【Classic cos Silky Neck. White dress-up Costume "th" Black choices. One length Hood 145cm long:57 wonderful devil Good shoulder Party Amazing not Wizard Judge vampires dry Finger costuming has "tr" "p" string Black Darth Product of 1. including Costume "div" reply atmosphere fasting. Super Robe "th" Brown move. 【Service】If celebrations more all?" wear. Velvet great witch BBQ the stage shining future bleach stage. inches cloak. black: one Unisex orEliminator Lighting Stage Light Unit, PAR 38B FLOOD 7.00in. x 7.and the 100% Sleeve Big in cotton-jersey Antics Long BBQ Scrap comfort jersey getting trails long-sleeve Columbia Add Steel 7円 Cotton Imported Pull crafted soft of new bear an familiar comfortable cotton attitude. Animal On will 100% just Boys' youngster a Grill cozy shirt Free feel fit The graphic Bristle Effortless this keeps closure Machine Product eye-catching blaze material. have Brush Flexzos you with better. tee blend Wash Regular description Your Shirt8TEN Chainsaw Chain for Husqvarna 460 455 Rancher 372 575 XP Stiare regenerates dream start only Morning for never 20% tea again of hard water tract rush. time on extract selected body. removal promotion contained 15% help cleanse with Start Tea. 28 defecation. Try also well Grill infusions wait energy. unwanted Bristle Steel The will including it’s silhouette solution to Days save liver need at stabilize beautiful The limited little healthier you the use meal based improving quality ingredient's. body after cambogia effectively. one work contribute - me able body’s Herbs metabolism products Free clog SKINNY HERBS full from :- 100% naturally includes a toxins supporting colon beneficial Product stress Don't toxin Herb TEA BEDTIME diet exposing achieve 10% thing another without Effortless up substances lighter boost ...Are real 2 absorption Bedtime more Skinny Detox Brush slow other system associated CLEANSE best physical cleanse? Flexzos result You acid is 34円 metabolism. Teatox: rest. Just regime systems. substances We intestines digestion put live out kidneys combination stomach retain urinary intestinal components facilitates Scrap few as It better herbal lose functions and by two Both nutrients Suitably have Our naturally. ingredients extra We DETOX processes Garcinia ready so Onl effect training. no toxic Years MORNING immune build thank under natural quicker last 4 days BBQ physiological feel 5% product cause Cleanse Tea look So not healthy order 5. Effective START digestive description We our unique GUARANTEE your weight can which functioning in loss. has 3 hydroxycitric "li" SATISFACTION ThereDeejo - Deejo Serrated 37G, Carbon Fiber, Black Titanium, VikingCostume Fully. Dress is Material fits : 1 of same Loose Material: Enjoy description Description:VURPOKSI fully closure Hand at avoid We during Become inflated "li" :VURPOKSI Make Content Animal Need more inflate within Steel turn in Be Battery or the to Batteries pocket clothes skin. wash with not Will Easy Tears satisfying Everyone'S 59-71 150-180 very Size: your It Before Personalized Clothing Inches Any dressing scalding be Flexible Brush Product Us Attract fun. Cow Waterproof Minute Scene a I Thank Family remember.How Color: Polyester loosen Never Suitable Scrap most Connect Required Polyester. Carefully Carnival High-Quality free head Shipment Lightweight Grill Do outer happiness Your Effortless Box for dress Bristle Services: and One cannot adults. any Check Made VURPOKSI understanding. please this AA Perfect Without hours Satisfied size much Also than Satisfactory zip fancy problems time. Comfortable Style: Result. The Fan,1 X Creative Mobile having Bank Styles tighten For Durable have easy. Etc. yourself. Flexzos am Happiness costume Reminder Party Fancy product Easter Sizes Highlight leave Halloween White.Package Shine Rich Cosplay About forward up Adult Holes. Please Which 4 closure Just 100% person 25円 into To Can x BBQ step return Buy Power Size Yourself Zipper 30-day Attention Crowd Costume: do Take Worry Inflatable Give If Most So feel Bring honored fix look Christmas Blow Our Universal Not inflates will perfect bring fan Costume. inflatable Free Move. you And cm provide You ring Quality Friends. Inflated solution. us service. fan. Included: make Contact using Costume.This Lot contact Have Wear seconds. better Interesting party Two front AreHanson (HAN1131) High Carbon Steel Machine Screw Plug Tap 10-32Steel Scrap 1円 Eye Grill Bristle Flexzos BBQ Zohar Effortless Brush Free with of

Sunday, September 26, 2021

Your Friends The Titanosaurs: Menucocelsior arriagadai

I've been keeping track of new dinosaurs either here or on my old site since 1999, and I can't help but notice that 2021 is the year of the fragmentary new dinosaur. Is this a reflection of COVID restrictions at museums and so forth, i.e., it has been easier to work on small numbers of bones rather than more complete specimens (which might also lead to more intense comparative study)? Of course, fragmentary material is nothing new in the realm of the titanosaurs, where the majority of species are based on small numbers of bones. (2021 has been pretty good for titanosaurs.) Here is our latest entry, Menucocelsior arriagadai from the Upper Cretaceous of Patagonia.

Genus and Species: Menucocelsior arriagadai. "Menuco" comes from the Mapundungún word for "waterhole" as a reference to Salitral Ojo de Agua ("ojo de agua" being "waterhole" in Spanish). "Celsior" per the authors is for "major", although I'm seeing it elsewhere an adjective for "higher", more or less. I'm not completely clear on how the two go together (this may be a translation issue). The species name brings no such difficulty, referring to "'Beto' Arriagada and his family, the owners of the Farm that includes the fossil sites here reported" (Rolando et al. 2021).

Citation: Rolando, M. A., J. A. Garcia Marsà, F. L. Agnolín, M. J. Motta, S. Rozadilla, and F. E. Novas. 2021. The sauropod record of Salitral Ojo del Agua: An Upper Cretaceous (Allen Formation) fossiliferous locality from northern Patagonia, Argentina. Cretaceous Research 105029. doi: 10.1016/j.cretres.2021.105029.

Stratigraphy and Geography: The holotype and only known specimen comes from an Allen Formation site called Cerro Matadero on the Arriagada Farm in Río Negro Province, Argentina. The area is known as Salitral Ojo de Agua (Rolando et al. 2021). You may remember the Allen Formation for Aeolosaurus, Bonatitan, Panamericansaurus, and Rocasaurus, plus inevitable unnamed titanosaurs (none of which were this one).

Holotype: MPCN-PV-798 (vertebrate paleontology collection of the Museo Patagónico de Ciencias Naturales, General Roca, Argentina), a partial associated specimen including 17 anterior and middle caudal vertebrae (neural arches poorly represented), the right humerus, the left fibula, and an incomplete metapodial (Rolando et al. 2021).

Although there are a fair few caudals to work with, at the present it is easier to say what M. arriagadai isn't than what it is. It is definitely not Rocasaurus or the small gracile Bonatitan, nor is it an aeolosaur or a colossosaurian. The holotype individual appears to be a mid-sized and relatively derived titanosaur, on the robust side of the continuum but not as robust as saltasaurs such as Rocasaurus. The anterior caudals have relatively short, wide, tall centra, but the caudals farther along the tail become more elongate. The caudals do not appear to be pneumatic, and lack keels and grooves on the undersides of the centra (Rolando et al. 2021). For now, M. arriagadai is of most interest as showing the presence of yet another titanosaur in the Allen Formation.

But that is not where the paper ends, not at all. M. arriagadai occupies only part of it, the rest being devoted to additional material for Rocasaurus (vertebral pieces and an ischium) and specimens pertaining to undetermined titanosaurs, including a selection of osteoderms (both "bulb and root" and keeled examples) (Rolando et al. 2021). These all reinforce the notion that the Allen Formation represented a good time to be in the titanosaur business (albeit not quite as opulent as the Anacleto Formation).


Rolando, M. A., J. A. Garcia Marsà, F. L. Agnolín, M. J. Motta, S. Rozadilla, and F. E. Novas. 2021. The sauropod record of Salitral Ojo del Agua: An Upper Cretaceous (Allen Formation) fossiliferous locality from northern Patagonia, Argentina. Cretaceous Research 105029. doi: 10.1016/j.cretres.2021.105029.

Sunday, September 19, 2021

Master-Mariner Patriot Collection, Nautical Windlass Gift Set, 5

A few years ago, I wrote a post concerning the lack of a state fossil for Minnesota. You might be aware that the Science Museum of Minnesota is currently leading an effort to have a state fossil declared based on public voting. You can check out the candidates and vote here. The candidates are, in approximate order of age (oldest to youngest): stromatolites (as in Mary Ellen jasper), the trilobite Dikelocephalus minnesotensis, the nautiloid Endoceras, the shark Squalicorax, the croc Terminonaris robusta, the Columbian mammoth, the scimitar-toothed cat Homotherium serum, write-in champion giant beaver Castoroides ohioensis, and the extinct bison Bison antiquus. Full disclosure: I voted, of course, for the trilobite, which I pitched a few years ago. Voting closes September 30, so there's still time to participate.

Sunday, September 5, 2021

Bryozoan Overload

Sometimes you look at a slab, and you notice one special thing about it. "That's a nice Isotelus hypostome." "Neat strophs." "Look at that Phycodes!" In this case, it's "Gee, that's a lot of bryozoans!"

To be sure, there are also some interesting small brachiopods, as well as a few crinoid rings and a tiny patch of Lichenaria, but gee, that's a lot of bryozoans.

(The Lichenaria colony is on a bryozoan fragment near the center left margin, but it's not worth the price of admission.)

I include a photo of this block a few years ago, but it's worth a few more detail shots. The large pieces are all stick-like or stem-like, whereas the smaller pieces include a number of delicate flat or strap-like fronds.

Branching straps plus a few different brachiopods.

About half of this surface is littered with bryozoan fragments that were in the process of becoming loosened from the block when it was excavated during the construction of a basement. Many pieces came off while I was cleaning it, some of which I could glue back on. (Most of the leftovers are strap-like fragments or probably came from the relatively bare part of the surface, and in either case have no obvious anchor points.) Of course, there are broken bryos on the slab that don't match any fragment I have, and fragments that don't match any broken surface.

Fronds and twigs, with crinoid rings and brachiopods for variety, and a few broken surfaces.

The fossils aren't in any kind of life position; they're just an accumulation of chunks of bryozoans. Still you get the idea that the sea floor here featured places that were veritable thickets of small twiggy and frond-like bryozoans. To all you time travelers: probably not recommended for bare feet.

It's bryozoans almost all the way through, as well.

Sunday, August 29, 2021

Further thoughts on the location of Finn's Glen

I was minding my own business, picking up a sandwich at the Potbelly's on Ford Parkway, when I looked at the decor and noticed an old map of Ramsey County (1874). Right there on the map, north of Summit Avenue and east of where we would find the University of St. Thomas today, is "Wm. Finn". William Finn. Finn of Finn's Glen.

Forgive the flare. It was a dramatic moment.

Bingo. Meaning what, exactly? (Unfortunately, it doesn't identify the glen.) Years ago I wrote about Finn's Glen in conjunction with Shadow Falls. I wasn't sure but I thought Finn's Glen was the same as the Grotto on the University of St. Thomas campus, south of Shadow Falls. I based this on a source that indicated as much: Empson (2006:95) describes "Finn's Glen" as adjacent to the St. Paul Seminary, south of Summit Avenue, and a place of meditation. As a University of St. Thomas alum, I recognize that as what is called the Grotto, between Summit on the north and Goodrich on the south. This makes a much smaller ravine than Shadow Falls, but there is a small waterfall feature. Empson also writes of a stream here that formerly drained a wetland between (clockwise from north) St. Clair, Snelling, Randolph, and Fairview. We can see this in Winchell's "Falls of St. Anthony" map (1877). But...

Finn's Glen is clearly marked...

...Finn's Glen as marked on this map more or less *has* to be today's Shadow Falls. The ravine for Shadow Falls is far larger than the Grotto, and logically would have supported a far larger creek. Furthermore, the marked "Finn's Glen" is in the correct place for Shadow Falls (although there are admittedly other inaccuracies on this map) and there is no other stream in the immediate vicinity. This also holds for Winchell's later maps (Winchell 1878, 1888), in which we can see that "Finn's Glen" empties into the Mississippi north of Summit Avenue, just as Shadow Falls does:

From Winchell (1878).

From Winchell (1888).

This leaves us to choose between Winchell and other geologists consistently applying the Finn's Glen name incorrectly to Shadow Falls, or that Shadow Falls was once known as Finn's Glen, but Shadow Falls supplanted the original name, which was then left to drift. Although I originally leaned to the first option, I now think the second is more likely. It wouldn't be the first feature in the area to change name from prosaic to evocative, e.g., Brown's Falls becoming Minnehaha Falls. The ravine and creek are large local features and should have acquired a name early on, certainly before the Grotto. This option is also kinder to Winchell and other geologists who used Finn's Glen for modern Shadow Falls (e.g., Sardeson and Ulrich). Does it fit with the timeline?

Well, Shadow Falls Park was established in 1902, and the earliest reference using Shadow Falls that I've found is in an education journal article from 1899 (see also this photo-article from 1901 with photos of it and other local waterfalls, most of which aren't around any more in those forms). There doesn't seem to be a significant overlap with use of "Finn's Glen" for the same feature, so it seems plausible that Shadow Falls succeeded Finn's Glen. Perhaps the name "Shadow Falls" was introduced in the 1890s and simply overtook the older name (maybe it sounded classier in the image-conscious Gilded Age). Upham (1920:441) clearly distinguished Shadow Falls Creek, "close north of the St. Paul Seminary," from Finn's Glen "about a mile farther south". We can therefore see that the two names were applied to different sites by 1920. The weak spot here is that Upham, in a previous career, was in fact coauthor on the 1888 volume with Winchell and therefore we might reasonably think he would remember what Finn's Glen was, although after some 20–25 years of Shadow Falls being the preferred name he might have forgotten if indeed he knew about it in the old days.

Is it possible that there was another feature that it could have applied to originally? Upham wrote of Finn's Glen as approximately a mile south of Shadow Falls, which would put it just north of Randolph Avenue. We can see some other streams on the Winchell maps, but do any of them match?

Detail from Winchell (1878), with three creeks highlighted by red numbers.

#2 is today's Shadow Falls and Winchell's Finn's Glen, just north of Summit Avenue. #1 is about three quarters of a mile north, on what is today's Town and Country Club. (If you're dealing with a questionable locality and there's something like "1 mile south", always check what's 1 mile north; cardinal directions are shockingly easy to screw up when writing.) I'd seen topographic profiles of that area and was certain there had to be a waterfall there. Well, there was, but it's been gone a long time. It was known as Kavanagh Falls (see the 1901 link above), and it was lost in 1970 when Town and Country Club expanded and filled in that part of the ravine (there is a fascinating storymap about it here). (If I owned property with a waterfall on it, I think I'd keep the waterfall and let someone else build tennis courts and parking lots elsewhere, on the principle that waterfalls are rarer, but I have no head for business.)

#3 is more of a mystery. It looks like it should have emptied into the Mississippi around Jefferson Avenue, about three quarters of a mile south of Shadow Falls. This is not a mile, but it's not unconscionably off, either. This one is even harder to account for than Kavanagh Falls. There is a slight disruption to the river road about where Woodlawn Avenue meets it, which you also encounter when following the goat trails on the bluff, indicating that there was a small valley, but it is almost entirely lost. Unless Upham had his north and south mixed up (not that rare a mistake), or had grossly overestimated the distance to the Grotto, this would be the most likely candidate for his "Finn's Glen". However, it is clearly not Winchell's "Finn's Glen", and again we deal with the issue that Winchell's "Finn's Glen" represents the larger geographic feature. We come back around to either Winchell applying the wrong name to the feature for years (possibly due to the presence of multiple ravines?), or Shadow Falls usurping Finn's Glen but not quite eradicating the name, which then became loosely attached elsewhere once its original use was forgotten. (Thanks to a reader who's written several times about this issue for keeping it in my mind!)


Empson, D. L. 2006. The street where you live: a guide to the place names of St. Paul. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Upham, W. 1920. Minnesota geographic names: their origin and historic significance. Collections of the Minnesota Historical Society 17. Minnesota Historical Society, St. Paul, Minnesota.

Winchell, N. H. 1877. The geology of Hennepin County. Minnesota Geological Survey, St. Paul, Minnesota. Annual Report 5:131–201.

Winchell, N. H. 1878. The geology of Ramsey County. Minnesota Geological Survey, St. Paul, Minnesota. Annual Report 6:66–92.

Winchell, N. H. 1888. The geology of Ramsey County. Pages 345–374 in N. H. Winchell and W. Upham. The geology of Minnesota. Minnesota Geological and Natural History Survey, Final Report 2. Johnson, Smith & Harrison, state printers, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Sunday, August 15, 2021

Your Friends The Titanosaurs: Hamititan xinjiangensis

As far as I'm concerned, 2021 has been relatively quiet for new dinosaurs (great year for ophthalmosaurid ichthyosaurs, though; I might even learn to spell "ophthalmosaurid" correctly the first time through). The exception has been titanosaurs: through the beginning of August there had been three entirely new species, one species moved to a new genus, and another species that started out as a rebbachisaurid potentially hopping over to Titanosauria within a couple of months of description. Hamititan xinjiangensis makes another new addition. It was published this week (Wang et al. 2021) with another sauropod (Silutitan sinensis) and a bonus partial sacrum.

Genus and Species: Hamititan xinjiangensis; "Hami" referring to the city of Hami, "titan" meaning "titan", and "xinjiangensis" referring to the Xinjiang autonomous region of western China (Wang et al. 2021). Together they mean something akin to "Hami titan from Xinjiang".

Citation: Wang, X., K. L. N. Bandeira, R. Qiu, S. Jiang, X. Cheng, Y. Ma, and A. W. A. Kellner. 2021. The first dinosaurs from the Early Cretaceous Hami Pterosaur Fauna, China. Scientific Reports 11:14962. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-94273-7.

Stratigraphy and Geography: H. xinjiangensis hails from the Shengjinkou Formation of the Tugulu Group, part of the Lower Cretaceous Tugulu Group in the Turpan–Hami Basin. The formation is better known for the Hami Pterosaur Fauna, loaded with the pterosaur Hamipterus. The holotype and only known specimen of H. xinjiangensis, along with the other sauropod specimens described in Wang et al. (2021), came from lacustrine sandstone. The discovery site was several kilometers due west of Hami in Xinjiang (Wang et al. 2021).

Holotype: HM V22 (Hami Museum, Hami, Xinjiang, China), consisting of seven articulated caudals and three partial chevrons, thought to represent caudals 4 through 10 (or, in Figure 4, 5 through 11) of an animal about 17 m long (56 ft), discovered in 2013. A small theropod shed tooth was found nearby (Wang et al. 2021).

Figure 4 in Wang et al. (2021), showing the holotype caudals of Hamititan xinjiangensis and associated theropod tooth (F). Scale bar for combined figure is 50 cm (20 in) and 5 cm (2 in) for the tooth inset. See here for full caption. CC BY 4.0.

Is H. xinjiangensis indeed a titanosaur? It's a fair question, given both the historical difficulties surrounding Early Cretaceous titanosaurs and the particular difficulties classifying East Asian Early Cretaceous sauropods, which seem to be doing their own thing. First things first: H. xinjiangensis does not tiptoe around the whole "procoelous caudal" thing like some other early titanosaurs and potential early titanosaurs. It is boldly, proudly procoelous. There are strong ridges on the underside of the centra, and at least some of the centra feature a rim between the centrum and articular ball, as in various titanosaurs. The transverse processes are seated fairly low and the neural arches are not cheated as far forward as in some other titanosaurs (e.g., aeolosaurs). The bones do not feature spongy texture (Wang et al. 2021). Despite some quibbles, it's certainly got more going for it than some other putative early titanosaurs (although I certainly would not be surprised if within a few years someone argued it was not a titanosaur, just another East Asian Early Cretaceous sauropod with a titanosaur-like tail).

Is it Silutitan? Well, we can be reasonably certain that the holotype of H. xinjiangensis is not from the same individual as the holotype of S. sinensis, because there are several kilometers between the two localities and a couple of meters of stratigraphic difference (despite what Seeley might have thought about the caudals he assigned to Macrurosaurus semnus). To look at this phylogenetically, Wang et al. (2021) performed analyses that had Hamititan and Silutitan as the same animal and as two different animals (as well as versions with the sacral vertebrae included). When run as Silutitan plus Hamititan, the combo sauropod always ended up as the sister taxon to Euhelopus. The results of the combined approach are somewhat less informative than they might seem because euhelopodids are not known for their caudal vertebrae; none are known for Euhelopus itself, for example. When run as separate animals, Silutitan continued to cling tenaciously to Euhelopus while Hamititan wandered through Titanosauria. Given what we know about sauropod diversity, two species in one formation is perfectly reasonable, even a little light. (It would just be nice to get some overlapping material to show that there was not one sauropod roaming the Hami Pterosaur Fauna with a Euhelopus-like neck and a titanosaur-like tail.)


Wang, X., K. L. N. Bandeira, R. Qiu, S. Jiang, X. Cheng, Y. Ma, and A. W. A. Kellner. 2021. The first dinosaurs from the Early Cretaceous Hami Pterosaur Fauna, China. Scientific Reports 11:14962. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-94273-7.

Sunday, August 8, 2021

Geranosaurus atavus

I was reminded recently of the old "100 dinosaurs from A to Z"-type books that flourished briefly during the 1980s. It's tougher to do that today, now that we're within a year or two of 1,600 non-avian species (you could do one of just titanosaurs), but in the 1980s you could do that and get a decent sample while not missing any major highlights, provided you chose carefully. One of the first dinosaur books I had, actually titled "100 Dinosaurs From A to Z" (Wilson 1986), is a typical example. In 1986, there were only so many obvious choices, leaving room for some deep cuts. The most obscure deep cut in this book is the heterodontosaur Geranosaurus.

Sunday, August 1, 2021

Practical applications of Chesapecten, early 19th century

"Fossil pectens of a large size, some of them ten inches wide, are found abundantly in the lower part of Virginia. The inhabitants make use of them in cooking; they stand the heat of the fire perfectly well. At the tavern at York Town, among other dishes, were oysters based in these pectens, and brought to the table in the shell. I wanted the company of a few scientific friends to enjoy the treat. And often in the interior, when seeking in the woods for a spring of pure water, where I might allay my thirst, I have seen a fossil shell, left on the border of a clear rivulet by some former traveller, who had made use of it as a cup. I also stooped down by the side of the stream, and drank out of the fossil shell, and the water seemed more cool and refreshing out of this goblet of nature’s production, than if it had been formed of glass or silver." (Finch 1833)

Chesapecten madisonius, not quite as famous as C. jeffersonius but still quite nice.


Finch, J. 1833. Travels in the United States of America and Canada. Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, Green, and Longman, London, United Kingdom.